An asylum seeker recently brought to the UK under the controversial 'one in, one out' scheme expressed his concerns about the fairness of the policy. The individual, who arrived legally from France, stated that it feels unjust to benefit from the deportation of another asylum seeker who may share a similar case. This policy allows for the legal entry of one asylum seeker into the UK in exchange for the forced return of another to France.
Concerns About Fairness in the Asylum Process
The asylum seeker, who remains anonymous to protect his identity, elaborated on his feelings during an interview. He remarked, “I am very happy to be here, but it’s not fair that another asylum seeker who may have a very similar case to mine but arrived in a small boat has been sent back to France so I can come here legally.” He underscored his disapproval of the policy, emphasizing that he does not support the forced deportation of others for his entry.
Since the announcement of the 'one in, one out' scheme last July, over 900 individuals have been allowed into the UK to apply for asylum, while a similar number has faced deportation. The charity Safe Passage, which assists asylum seekers in France, criticized the policy as “not a genuine route to protection.”
Legal Entry vs. Dangerous Crossings
The asylum seeker acknowledged the significant differences between his legal journey and the perilous small boat crossings undertaken by many others. He noted, “I applied for a university scholarship, but was told I am not eligible because I am an asylum seeker. I am doing some volunteering, but by not allowing us to work or study and just waiting, the Home Office is teaching us to be lazy.”





