The Miami-based AI startup Subquadratic emerged from stealth mode last month with a bold announcement. The company claims it has resolved a significant mathematical bottleneck that has hindered large language models (LLMs) for nearly a decade. Initially met with skepticism, Subquadratic has begun to provide evidence backing its claims, including results from an independent evaluation of its innovative technology.
Subquadratic unveiled its new model, named SubQ, which the company asserts is faster, cheaper, and requires significantly less energy compared to existing models. The startup claims SubQ can process up to 12 times more text simultaneously than most models, enabling it to tackle data-intensive tasks such as analyzing hundreds of documents or entire codebases.
SubQ's Performance Compared to Leading Models
According to Subquadratic, SubQ performs on par with leading models from Google DeepMind, OpenAI, and Anthropic in key areas like coding. Despite this, the company initially faced backlash due to a lack of substantial evidence beyond self-published test scores. As skepticism grew, industry experts began to question the validity of Subquadratic's claims.
After a month of scrutiny, Subquadratic released further details about SubQ, including results from independent tests conducted by the firm Appen. “We expected healthy skepticism,” said Alex Whedon, cofounder and CTO of Subquadratic. “In hindsight, releasing the third-party benchmarks alongside the initial announcement would have preempted much of the skepticism.”
Independent Validation of SubQ's Claims
Appen's evaluation provided a more comprehensive look at SubQ's capabilities, validating many of Subquadratic's assertions. Jeanine Sinanan-Singh, Appen’s director of generative AI research, expressed excitement over the results, stating, “That was really exciting to me; it validated their architecture.” She added that while SubQ may not completely replace existing top models, it could significantly enhance speed and reduce costs for specific tasks.





