A group of leading doubles players has expressed serious concerns regarding the ATP Tour's proposed changes, which could significantly reduce the viability of doubles as a profession. During a meeting at Wimbledon on July 3, 2026, players were informed of plans that could halve the size of doubles draws starting in 2028, limiting competition at ATP 1000 events to just 16 teams and smaller tournaments to only eight.
The ATP Tour's proposal suggests a reduction in the percentage of prize money allocated to doubles players, decreasing from 20% to 10%. This change would redirect funds to singles players, a move that doubles players argue undermines their contributions to the sport. In a statement, they asserted, "Doubles isn’t a carnival sideshow. It is one of the most successful parts of tennis - integral to the amateur game - with the potential to do so much more."
Concerns Over Future of Professional Doubles
The proposed changes have raised alarm among players, particularly regarding the future of those ranked outside the world’s top 30. According to the players, the new structure would make it nearly impossible for those lower-ranked athletes to sustain a living through doubles. "Do the maths on what that means for anyone outside the top 30: it will be impossible to make a living," they stated, emphasizing that this is not a minor adjustment.
Many in the tennis community believe that the existing 20% revenue share for doubles players is disproportionate compared to the perceived interest in doubles matches. The shift reflects a broader trend where the ATP Tour has effectively divided players into two distinct groups, increasing the strain on facilities and resources at tournaments.
ATP's Response to Doubles Players' Concerns
An ATP spokesperson addressed the situation, stating, "We are assessing the doubles product, draw sizes and player compensation distribution with the aim of creating a more sustainable long-term model while maintaining doubles' important role on the tour." They indicated that the review aims to balance the interests of doubles players with the financial realities facing singles competitions.
Furthermore, the ATP plans to consult closely with players, tournaments, and the ATP board before implementing any changes. They claim that adjustments could potentially lead to increased investment in early-round singles prize money, aiding more players in sustaining their careers.
Broader Implications for Tennis Prize Money Distribution
This development occurs as leading singles players continue to advocate for a larger share of Grand Slam revenue to be allocated to prize money. They are also pressing for enhanced welfare benefits, including pensions and maternity leave. Earlier this week, players ended their boycott of Wimbledon media duties following productive discussions with the All England Club.
The ongoing debate about prize money distribution highlights the complex dynamics within professional tennis, as both doubles and singles players navigate the economic landscape of the sport. As changes loom, the future of professional doubles remains uncertain, with players united in their call for fair treatment and recognition.
🤖 This article was rewritten by Feed and Figures' editorial AI from a report originally published by BBC Sport. Facts and quotes are preserved from the original; the rewrite focuses on clarity and structure. For the unedited original, see the source link below.
